Friday, November 7, 2008

Reaction on Race

Greetings GoodPeople,

I send you this message today after much contemplation and observation. The United States of America has done something that I NEVER thought I would live to see. I say this because my current contemplation and observation is a direct result of the election of Senator Barack Obama as President of the United States of America. I, for one, thought this acheivement was near impossible. [Because I was wrong, there is tremendous lesson in this event.] As I write this letter to you, the trees outside my apartment are decorated with bright autumn reds, oranges, and yellows...a natural sign of CHANGE. Like the trees, I and my country, are moving through a change as well.

I study Human Communication (Rhetoric), Culture, Politics, Race, and Power. I've also learned a substantial amount about Mass Media in the year 2008. I currently instruct an Introductory course on Mass Media at Loyola College in Maryland. My students submit four "reaction" papers during the period of a semester. These papers serve multiple functions, but above all, it allows them the freedom of expression. They receive the opportunity argue, extend, discredit, or agree with any material they feel is pertinent to material discussed in class. Though these assignments are usually submitted to ME, in the spirit of CHANGE, I am submitting a "reaction" paper to THEM (and anyone else in the world who reads these words).

This "reaction" paper is submitted in response to our inter-racial/inter-cultural discussions on Thursday, October 30th and Thursday, November 7th. My thoughts are as follows:

October 30th

Students within the Mass Media communication course I instruct at Loyola College in Maryland presented PetriDish to a group of media/cultural practitioners of whom I met during my tenure at Morgan State University. PetriDish is a blogspot that the class is constructing as a Final Semester Project. Its general bend is one of culture; more specifically the culture of Baltimore City, Maryland. For those who may not know, Loyola College is predominantly White and Morgan State University if predominantly Black. (These instituions are approximately 2 miles from each other.)

That initial meeting (October 30th) was, to my chagrin, an incomplete and unbalanced dialogue on race and culture...which also seemed to lack a clear structure or goal. As one who has conducted my share of inter-racial conversations on race, I DID notice some familiar patterns. My general assessments are as follows: 1.) Blacks speak with much more intensity and fervor on issues of race; 2.) Whites listen with more intensity and fervor on issues of race.

I was already familiar with these aformentioned observations, so consequently, we had to hold another meeting in hopes of gaining a greater understanding of such a pervasive yet elusive issue (race may very well be the ultimate paradox).

November 7th

Yesterday, November 7th, we came back together to "finish" our discussion on race and culture. Believing it beneficial to introduce a theoretical construct that could "guide" the conversation, we began our conversation familiarinzing ourselves with scholarly notions of Black Rage (Gladney, 1995; Henderson, 1996; West, 1994) and White Guilt (Lewis, 2006; McCarthy, 1998; Steele, 2006). After gaining an understanding of these two notions, and more importantly, understanding how they "cooperatively" act as impediments to "Buberian" dialogue between races....we seemed more able to move in a progressive direction on the subject. I observed in this particular meeting that my two earlier observations can be challenged due to my 1.)observation of Whites speaking with more fervor and intensity about their observations and worldview, and 2.) witnessing Blacks listen with a bit more interest and curiosity regarding Whitness. I also witnessed and participated in Blacks and Whites disagreeing on key/critical issues INTRAracially...which I believe takes a large dose of courage and fortitude; considering our racial history.

Important Notes:

1.) Participants in these conversations were between the ages of 18-30 years. At 30 years, I was the oldest in the room.
2.) I don't subscribe to the sentiment often heard in the Mass Media that purports notions that the youth have little or NO problem with race. I do believe, however, if we are diligent and honest with our approaches to race we can make significant positive changes.
3.) I believe we are all aware that these conversations aren't the most comfortable, so "Kudos" to all those that were present and active in the conversation. I have no doubt you're a BETTER person for it.

Unresolved Questions

1.) Was intra-continental African slavery of the same type as American chattel slavery; in reference to humanity and brutality, of course?

2.) Is the term "oppression" over-used by Blacks as an excuse for non-performance OR are there active/contemporary mechanisms of oppresion at work in society which constrain Black freedoms?

During the time I've taken to submit this blog, I've watched the first press conference held by President-elect Barack Obama. I must say, I have the distinct feeling America, as a nation, made the correct choice...and I have little doubt we'll all be the better for it. The sun is now setting on the wonderful array of Autumn colors outside my window. Just as the autumn leaves and the setting sun have shown me today, CHANGE is natural...CHANGE is good.

Stay tuned for video uploads of our discussion....and feel free to leave your commentary!

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think this was a very timely discussion given the new phase of race relations that Barack Obama's election to the US presidency ushers in.

American society is not colour blind at all and race is still a very difficult topic for Americans to discuss.

I think the myth of colour blindness has contributed to this dis-ease that people generally feel where race is concerned and so in thre name of politeness we ignore the obvious, that race does matter, that there is such a thing as white priviledge, and yes, even black oppression.

So think the strong feelings that both sides exhibited at your discussion is reflective of colour blindness at work, the myth that is.

Educating ourselves about race, questioning our own assumptions about race, being open to the possibility that the other isnt so bad after all, getting rid of the pretense and being honest about ourselves is important.

Great job with the discussion Dr. E. It opened up a pandoras box but in a good way.

Re the unanswered questions about differences in the experiences of trans Atlantic slavery; I think its important to think of differences only in so far as they help us understand the various indiosyncracies that shape different groups of blacks. if this consideration will help us be more tolerant of each other then good, but unfortunately I dont think people see this opportunity and generally there is a degeneration of such discussions into superiority debacles.

Anon